TydroInkPoints Season 2: Introducing Boost Multipliers

Season 2 is live, and with it comes a new layer on top of the regular TydroInkPoints incentive rewards: boost multipliers.

All the details on the base TydroInkPoints incentive rewards and their budget are referenced in this post here.

This post is the current, living reference for how boosts work and what they’re worth.
The table below is kept up to date: whenever a value, threshold, or cap changes, that change is posted as a new reply in this thread with its own changelog, and this table is updated to match.

What boosts do

Season 2 rewards are distributed through the same incentive mechanism as always. Boosts don’t create a bigger reward pool, they change how each wallet’s share of that pool is calculated. A wallet with no boost earns rewards at the base rate (1x). A boosted wallet earns a bigger share of that same pool for the same deposit.

Why boosts exist

Instead of splitting rewards evenly across every wallet, boosts make sure a larger share goes to wallets that have already supported Tydro, have a genuine track record, or are already part of the ecosystem Tydro is built within.

In short: two wallets depositing the same amount on the same day can end up earning different rewards, because they aren’t starting from the same place. Boosts are how that difference shows up.

The categories behind this, and the reasoning for each one, are detailed alongside the boost structure in the replies below.

How boosts work

Boosts are organized into categories, each with its own cap. Within a category, a wallet can qualify for more than one boost, and those stack up to that category’s cap. Across categories, boosts also stack, but the total is capped overall, no matter how high the individual categories add up. The categories and their caps are listed in the table below.

Current boost structure

This table reflects the current version of the system. It will be updated in place whenever a change is posted in the replies below.

Category (cap) Boost Value
OG Users (cap 20%) Tydro OG: used Tydro before 30 September 2026 ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%
Aave OG: Aave or Morpho Optimizer lender activity before 2024 ≥$1k: 10%
Ink OG: any onchain activity on Ink before Tydro’s launch date (25 July 2025) 5%
Lending Track Record (cap 30%) DeFi Lending user: history on another lending protocol, any activity before Season 2 start 5%
Lender: largest balance lent on Aave or Tydro, held for 30 days ≥$10k: 5%, ≥$100k: 7.5%, ≥$500k: 10%, ≥$1m: 12.5%, ≥$10m: 20%
Tydro Migrator: user that migrated from a lending protocol (excluding Aave) to Tydro ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%, ≥$100k: 15%, ≥$500k: 20%
kBTC Holdings (cap 25%) kBTC Holder: holds kBTC, akBTC, or (s)avkBTC(x) ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%
Global cap Maximum boost any single wallet can earn 50%

Worked example: how a category cap kicks in

Based on the structure above, say a wallet qualifies for:

  • Tydro OG, ≥$10k: 10%
  • Aave OG: 10%
  • Ink OG: 5%

That’s 25% in the OG Users category, but the category cap is 20%, so 20% is what actually counts toward the wallet’s boost, not 25%. The cap stops any single category from growing without limit, even for a wallet that checks every box in it.

If that same wallet also qualifies for a boost in another category, say the DeFi Lending user boost (5%) under Lending Track Record, that gets added on top: 20% + 5% = 25% total. Still well under the global cap, so the full 25% applies.

Version history

Version Date Change Reply
v1 9 September 2026 Initial Season 2 boost structure Link

Each row links to the reply in this thread where that version’s full breakdown, category explanations, and changelog were posted.


Not financial advice. Boosts affect a wallet’s share of a fixed reward pool; they are not a rate of return.

5 Likes

Boost Structure: v1

Boost structure

Category (cap) Boost Value
OG Users (cap 20%) Tydro OG: used Tydro before 30 September 2026 ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%
Aave OG: Aave or Morpho Optimizer lender activity before 2024 ≥$1k: 10%
Ink OG: any onchain activity on Ink before Tydro’s launch date (25 July 2025) 5%
Lending Track Record (cap 30%) DeFi Lending user: history on another lending protocol, any activity before Season 2 start 5%
Lender: largest balance lent on Aave or Tydro, held for 30 days ≥$10k: 5%, ≥$100k: 7.5%, ≥$500k: 10%, ≥$1m: 12.5%, ≥$10m: 20%
Tydro Migrator: user that migrated from a lending protocol (excluding Aave) to Tydro ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%, ≥$100k: 15%, ≥$500k: 20%
kBTC Holdings (cap 25%) kBTC Holder: holds kBTC, akBTC, or (s)avkBTC(x) ≥$100: 5%, ≥$10k: 10%
Global cap Maximum boost any single wallet can earn 50%

What each category rewards

  • OG Users. Wallets that were active on Tydro, Aave or on Ink, before these programs had any track record to point to. Being early carries real risk, and that’s worth recognizing.
  • Lending Track Record. Wallets with a genuine lending history, on Aave and Tydro directly or elsewhere in DeFi. This also recognizes wallets bringing existing lending positions over to Tydro.
  • kBTC Holdings. Wallets holding different forms of kBTC. This is currently the only boost in this category, more may be added here later.

See the top post for the full version history and changelog across every update to this system.

5 Likes

Hey MartinGbz, thanks for the post.

Have you considered how the boost system would work for users who naturally use multiple wallets for different purposes?

For example, I started exploring Ink back in January 2025, but that activity was mostly done through my everyday wallet. I generally keep the majority of my funds in a separate hardware wallet for security, and I only started using Tydro with that wallet in 2026.

As a result, different wallets I control may satisfy different eligibility criteria, even though they all represent the same user and the same overall history within the ecosystem.

Would you consider introducing some form of wallet linking or delegation, where users could prove ownership of multiple wallets and designate one wallet to receive the relevant boost eligibility? This could be designed so that eligibility cannot be double-counted across wallets.

I think this would better reflect how many users actually manage their funds, especially those who keep larger balances in cold/hardware wallets rather than in wallets used for everyday onchain activity.

1 Like

Hi, which address is evaluated for boosts: the one holding the aTokens, or the Merkl claim recipient? Is there any way to link or attest two addresses as the same user, so early history wasn’t lost when I moved to a multisig?

1 Like

Hey @sam @rege answering together since your questions are related.

Wallet linking was on the roadmap even before we launched Season 2, and we’re working on it! It’s just not live yet, it’ll come later on. Until then, eligibility stays with whichever wallet historically held the aTokens.

So, confirming that the eligible address is the one holding the aTokens, not the Merkl claim recipient.

1 Like

will there be on-chain wallet statistics so that he can see which categories he falls into?

1 Like

Will we see our ‘boost multiplier’ anywhere? Wondering how it’s going to work when it comes to Merkl rewards.

1 Like

@AntonyRich1 @Artilugio Answering both your questions here.

You can already see your multiplier on the Tydro app right now: Tydro - Markets: supply and borrow APY on Ink (we just updated the app)

User boost breakdowns are already in the pipe, and’ll come later on!

2 Likes

Btw, today we only display the pool-average APR (as if every wallet had a 1x boost), so depending on your boost, your real APR could already be higher or lower than what’s shown.
We’re now building a per-wallet APR that takes into account each address’s boosts.

2 Likes

thanks for the clarification. Just wonder if you have considered nfts with different tiers in the next step. Nft holders have their tiered boosts and the nft trading fee can be used to buy back $ink.

1 Like

In Tydro, the kBTC ‘Tydro receipt token’ is called akBTC.
In Aave, the kBTC ‘Aave aToken’ is called aInkWlKBTC.
These are one and the same, I think, so would be good if they shared the same name in both venues.

Would it be possible to add contract addresses for the kBTC tokens eligible for ‘boost’?
A bit of confusion in Discord over what’s included. (I think they’re all included but not 100% sure.)

The real explanation is: since Aave’s creation, the naming convention was to call the receipt token for supplied assets an “aToken.” But since V3, because Aave became multichain, aToken names started being based on both the reserve and the chain. So aInkWlKBTC and akBTC are the exact same token, the real onchain symbol is aInkWlKBTC, but akBTC is more understandable for most users.

Regarding the contract addresses, I’ve linked all the contract addresses to each token, so now it’s fully clear (fyi: click the “s” to get savkBTC, and the “x” to get avkBTCx).

1 Like

Small clarification regarding the boost display on the UI currently:

For now, only users participating in campaigns can see their boost displayed. If you’re not participating in any, you’ll see an x1 boost, while in reality you could be eligible for boosts.

We’re actively working on displaying the boost for both participating and non-participating users. In the meantime, you can start participating in a campaign to start seeing your boost (a few hours later).

We also clarified this on the UI

2 Likes

Interesting… 15% here!